For years, the financial industry has sold a powerful story. “Markets are open. Trading has been democratized. Anyone can invest.” But behind these promises lies a different reality—one that brokers and financial institutions would rather you not question. They say access is free. Yet every trader pays a price.
They say the playing field is fair. But the house always wins. The industry has never been about empowering traders. It has been about controlling them.
Access? Or an Engineered Illusion?
Ask yourself: If financial access is truly free and open, why is it that both CFD traders and stock investors lose at the same rate?
Why do gamified trading apps, praised for “democratizing investing,” deliver the same outcomes as the complex platforms they once set out to disrupt? What we’re really dealing with isn’t just one broken model—it’s an entire structure that’s been carefully optimized for engagement, not outcomes.
“The system profits not from your success—but from your participation. Whether you’re trading CFDs, stocks, or crypto, the mechanisms of dependency are the same.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
Whether it’s a market maker behind a leveraged forex trade, or a stock order routed through payment-for-order-flow, the trader sits at the same disadvantage:
● You don’t control the terms
● You don’t see the full picture
● And most of the time, you don’t know how your broker or platform profits from you
“Retail trading isn’t a free market—it’s a layered system of friction, incentives, and opaque decision-making designed to extract value, regardless of what you’re trading.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
The problem isn’t just the product. It’s the design of the entire retail trading ecosystem.
The Industry’s Greatest Trick
They built systems that look empowering but are designed to keep traders dependent.
- You don’t access the market directly. Intermediaries stand between you and every transaction.
- You’re sold “zero commissions,” but end up paying through spreads, slippage, and payment for order flow.
- You’re encouraged to trade more—not to succeed, but because your activity drives platform revenue.
- You’re rewarded with badges and confetti, not actual progress.
“When brokers claim they ‘empower’ traders, what they really mean is they ‘manage’ traders.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
Who Really Has Control?
Look at the fine print.
- Does your broker or platform profit from your losses?
- Do they offer transparent spreads, or do they change the moment volatility rises?
- Are your orders executed neutrally—or optimized for platform profit?
- Are you a client, or a line item on a revenue model?
“The tools have changed. The interfaces are slicker. The messaging is more inclusive. But the core business model remains the same.”
– Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
What Needs to Change?
Brokers won’t voluntarily change their business models. The current system is too profitable, too entrenched. And for many, too convenient to question.
So let’s question it.
Start Asking the Right Questions.
- We challenge you to check your broker’s conditions.
- Does your broker make money from your losses?
- Are spreads truly transparent, or do they change when the market moves?
- Who executes your trades—and what do they gain from it?
- Are you a client, or just a revenue source?
“We built Finvasia to break this cycle—to remove unnecessary layers and create real access. But the first step isn’t just offering an alternative. It’s exposing the game itself.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
This is Just the Beginning.
This isn’t about one platform, one broker, or one asset class. This is about a structure that’s long overdue for a reckoning. It’s about giving traders the truth—and forcing the industry to answer for it. The conversation is starting. Let’s make sure it’s one the industry can’t ignore.
For years, the financial industry has sold a powerful story. “Markets are open. Trading has been democratized. Anyone can invest.” But behind these promises lies a different reality—one that brokers and financial institutions would rather you not question. They say access is free. Yet every trader pays a price.
They say the playing field is fair. But the house always wins. The industry has never been about empowering traders. It has been about controlling them.
Access? Or an Engineered Illusion?
Ask yourself: If financial access is truly free and open, why is it that both CFD traders and stock investors lose at the same rate?
Why do gamified trading apps, praised for “democratizing investing,” deliver the same outcomes as the complex platforms they once set out to disrupt? What we’re really dealing with isn’t just one broken model—it’s an entire structure that’s been carefully optimized for engagement, not outcomes.
“The system profits not from your success—but from your participation. Whether you’re trading CFDs, stocks, or crypto, the mechanisms of dependency are the same.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
Whether it’s a market maker behind a leveraged forex trade, or a stock order routed through payment-for-order-flow, the trader sits at the same disadvantage:
● You don’t control the terms
● You don’t see the full picture
● And most of the time, you don’t know how your broker or platform profits from you
“Retail trading isn’t a free market—it’s a layered system of friction, incentives, and opaque decision-making designed to extract value, regardless of what you’re trading.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
The problem isn’t just the product. It’s the design of the entire retail trading ecosystem.
The Industry’s Greatest Trick
They built systems that look empowering but are designed to keep traders dependent.
- You don’t access the market directly. Intermediaries stand between you and every transaction.
- You’re sold “zero commissions,” but end up paying through spreads, slippage, and payment for order flow.
- You’re encouraged to trade more—not to succeed, but because your activity drives platform revenue.
- You’re rewarded with badges and confetti, not actual progress.
“When brokers claim they ‘empower’ traders, what they really mean is they ‘manage’ traders.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
Who Really Has Control?
Look at the fine print.
- Does your broker or platform profit from your losses?
- Do they offer transparent spreads, or do they change the moment volatility rises?
- Are your orders executed neutrally—or optimized for platform profit?
- Are you a client, or a line item on a revenue model?
“The tools have changed. The interfaces are slicker. The messaging is more inclusive. But the core business model remains the same.”
– Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
What Needs to Change?
Brokers won’t voluntarily change their business models. The current system is too profitable, too entrenched. And for many, too convenient to question.
So let’s question it.
Start Asking the Right Questions.
- We challenge you to check your broker’s conditions.
- Does your broker make money from your losses?
- Are spreads truly transparent, or do they change when the market moves?
- Who executes your trades—and what do they gain from it?
- Are you a client, or just a revenue source?
“We built Finvasia to break this cycle—to remove unnecessary layers and create real access. But the first step isn’t just offering an alternative. It’s exposing the game itself.” – Tajinder Virk, Group CEO and Co-Founder, Finvasia Group
This is Just the Beginning.
This isn’t about one platform, one broker, or one asset class. This is about a structure that’s long overdue for a reckoning. It’s about giving traders the truth—and forcing the industry to answer for it. The conversation is starting. Let’s make sure it’s one the industry can’t ignore.
